<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The ZRG Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Reporting on changes to Zimmerman&#039;s Research Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeing the future of Federal regulations by zimmermansguide</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/seeing-the-future-of-federal-regulations/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zimmermansguide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1821#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added Reginfo this weekend.  Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added Reginfo this weekend.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeing the future of Federal regulations by CJM</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/seeing-the-future-of-federal-regulations/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1821#comment-395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should probably add reginfo.gov as a potential source, since it&#039;s direct from OIRA and GSA. http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should probably add reginfo.gov as a potential source, since it&#8217;s direct from OIRA and GSA. <a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain" rel="nofollow">http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Document delivery on steroids by zimmermansguide</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/worldwide-document-delivery-service/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zimmermansguide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1692#comment-376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind this one, folks -- Documentis bit the dust.  Andy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind this one, folks &#8212; Documentis bit the dust.  Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New section on patent interferences by zimmermansguide</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/new-section-on-patent-interferences/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zimmermansguide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1729#comment-373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Mike! I added that to the entry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike! I added that to the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New section on patent interferences by Mike Willens</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/new-section-on-patent-interferences/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Willens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1729#comment-371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PTO also has a separate database for Interference decisions that were published as a result of FOIA requests: http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/BPAIReadingRoom.jsp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PTO also has a separate database for Interference decisions that were published as a result of FOIA requests: <a href="http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/BPAIReadingRoom.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/BPAIReadingRoom.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bouvier&#8217;s Law Dictionary back in print by zimmermansguide</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/bouviers-law-dictionary-still-in-print/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zimmermansguide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1711#comment-361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For more, see &quot;Book Review - The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier Law Dictionary, Desk Edition&quot; by Holly Lakatos at http://www.aallnet.org/Blogs/spectrum-blog/34079.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more, see &#8220;Book Review &#8211; The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier Law Dictionary, Desk Edition&#8221; by Holly Lakatos at <a href="http://www.aallnet.org/Blogs/spectrum-blog/34079.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aallnet.org/Blogs/spectrum-blog/34079.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New CFR by the Cornell Legal Information Institute by Thomas Bruce</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/new-cfr-by-the-cornell-legal-information-institute/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1648#comment-343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy:
You very well might want to use the e-CFR; that&#039;s why we provide a link to it on all of our CFR pages.  And we would surely be happy if either GPO or the OFR would provide bulk data that is as timely as what is in the e-CFR, so that we and others could develop alternative presentations.

For us, that&#039;s where the value is : improved search, improved navigation (we link *all* crossreferences within CFR and to external sources like the Code, and offer a lot of hierarchical navigation, right down to the subsection level),  better search, and an evolving set of advanced search features that will be based on Semantic Web technology.as well as some finding aids tied to the e-rulemaking dockets and to the FR. 

Currency&#039;s important, and some will, like you, find it to be a dealbreaker.  Others will do their search and navigation first, and then look for the most current version from our link to it.  Believe me, we&#039;d be as up to date as e-CFR if we could, and hopefully we will be sometime soon.  In the meantime, we think it&#039;s worthwhile to make the CFR more accessible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy:<br />
You very well might want to use the e-CFR; that&#8217;s why we provide a link to it on all of our CFR pages.  And we would surely be happy if either GPO or the OFR would provide bulk data that is as timely as what is in the e-CFR, so that we and others could develop alternative presentations.</p>
<p>For us, that&#8217;s where the value is : improved search, improved navigation (we link *all* crossreferences within CFR and to external sources like the Code, and offer a lot of hierarchical navigation, right down to the subsection level),  better search, and an evolving set of advanced search features that will be based on Semantic Web technology.as well as some finding aids tied to the e-rulemaking dockets and to the FR. </p>
<p>Currency&#8217;s important, and some will, like you, find it to be a dealbreaker.  Others will do their search and navigation first, and then look for the most current version from our link to it.  Believe me, we&#8217;d be as up to date as e-CFR if we could, and hopefully we will be sometime soon.  In the meantime, we think it&#8217;s worthwhile to make the CFR more accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on R.I.P.: LexisONE by zimmermansguide</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/r-i-p-lexisone/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zimmermansguide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1592#comment-330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good find!  I added that page back to the State Cases, Unreported Decisions and United States Supreme Court entries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find!  I added that page back to the State Cases, Unreported Decisions and United States Supreme Court entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on R.I.P.: LexisONE by JR</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/r-i-p-lexisone/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1592#comment-329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[still can seach new cases for free here:
http://webservices.lexisnexis.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=FCLDisplayCaseSearchForm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still can seach new cases for free here:<br />
<a href="http://webservices.lexisnexis.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=FCLDisplayCaseSearchForm" rel="nofollow">http://webservices.lexisnexis.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=FCLDisplayCaseSearchForm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Checking up on unpublished patent applications by Mike W.</title>
		<link>http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/checking-up-on-unpublished-patent-applications/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zimmermansguide.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Currently under review&quot; sounds a lot like it is pending, rather than one that is abandoned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Currently under review&#8221; sounds a lot like it is pending, rather than one that is abandoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
